A couple of nice cartoons that illustrate the differences between science as depicted in movies and TV – i.e. awesome, fast, and produced quick and definite results – vs real science, which is often slow, painstaking, and rarely produces the kind of conclusive results that can be stated with a whole bunch of qualifiers…
Here’s XKCD’s montage of movie science vs real science
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92cb8/92cb82209f48a45c127b96ba611dfd2846cccc2f" alt="XKCDMovieScience"
And via Discover’s Bad Astronomy blog, here’s Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal’s take on how science tv is different from actual science
[Via Bad Astronomy, XKCD, Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal]
I honourable don´t see movies evolving, For me it´s same the old movies, without the healthy bailiwick thing were such outstrip. They had categorize.